Subject	...obviously
Posted by	Drk93TT on September 29, 2008 at 11:31 PM
	This message has been viewed 114 times.
In Reply To	and lightweight fly and clutch (n/m) posted by gt300zxtt on September 29, 2008 at 11:01 PM
Message	I stated that it was just my opinion, anything other than intake, catback, ecu on an NA will not yield a significant power gain, especially when compared to a TT. I had a NA with intake, ex.,ecu,pulley,fly & clutch... and the pulley and clutch n fly had no noticable gains.
Follow Ups	More HP out of my N/A 3.0 - tandaman 22:10:51 09/29/08 Magic 8 ball says NO - Waggz 22:14:28 09/29/08 I love my NA :) - TriniTT 23:46:16 09/29/08 Don't get me wrong... - Waggz 00:16:22 09/30/08 Agreed. I simply recommend suspension and enjoy :) (n/m) - TriniTT 08:47:19 09/30/08 you dont get - Alan(MD/NJ) 22:15:33 09/29/08 pointless - Tikigod (Denver) 22:16:57 09/29/08 you are supposed to revert/keep it stock - gt300zxtt 22:37:00 09/29/08 All you can do is - Drk93TT 22:43:37 09/29/08 Re: All you can do is - reptile28 22:58:41 09/29/08 and lightweight fly and clutch (n/m) - gt300zxtt 23:01:33 09/29/08 ...obviously - Drk93TT 23:31:50 09/29/08 according to the dyno? - gt300zxtt 23:41:42 09/29/08 according to driving the car and feeling no difference - Drk93TT 06:48:16 09/30/08 as opposed to the 3 g pull you would feel with an intake? - gt300zxtt 09:15:42 09/30/08 I didnt notice a difference on my TT with the pulley. - John B. (NJ) 08:47:56 09/30/08 leaving the pulley of the list isnt opinion, its wrong. (n/m) - AntiHero 09:28:16 09/30/08 Your "ass dyno" wasn't working correctly it seems... - 92naz32 18:17:19 09/30/08 I'll fight you over saying you need an aftermarket clutch. (n/m) - dogpile 15:16:14 09/30/08 put 'em up them (n/m) - gt300zxtt 15:24:54 09/30/08 That poor car...*sigh* - V.S. 23:05:38 09/29/08 stop now, upgrade suspension and brakes and get some - LJZTT 00:07:28 09/30/08 The big irony is that adding horsepower is cheaper on a - zellamay 00:22:42 09/30/08 try more like the money to add 1 na hp will get you 5+ TT hp (n/m) - AntiHero 09:30:33 09/30/08 Slightly off topic, but a N/A is a great candidate - inferno 03:30:27 09/30/08 Oh stop. (n/m) - TriniTT 08:48:23 09/30/08 What, have I said something offensive? ;-) (n/m) - inferno 11:20:19 09/30/08 Re: More HP out of my N/A 3.0 - snowracer29 06:53:50 09/30/08 You might as well swap at that point. - John B. (NJ) 08:52:06 09/30/08 2nd, there is no point or value in TTing a NA motor (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 09:57:12 09/30/08 It has been done successfully with good results. - Kenny 10:05:23 09/30/08 IMO, not worth the hassle of pulling the motor, running the - BigTDogg (MA) 10:07:39 09/30/08 First off, there's no way you are at 240 to the wheels. - Musashi Sword 12:45:49 09/30/08 Go for as much weight reduction - Azotic 14:08:47 09/30/08 Re: More HP out of my N/A 3.0 - 92naz32 17:57:27 09/30/08 You're right Adrian about some of the benefits of the - Musashi Sword 23:22:22 09/30/08 2nd and... - Z_PREPared 01:00:42 10/01/08 LOL what? - dogpile 07:31:06 10/01/08 UR a Florida dentist who drives a Miata so STFU - Z_PREPared 11:41:40 10/01/08 yeah...light turbo cars are such a displeasure to drive... - dogpile 13:23:51 10/01/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.